You can listen to my 2009 interview with Muad’Dib here, and follow his case here. Also, you can listen to today’s conversation between Jim Fetzer and Muad’Dib’s friend Rob here. -KB
MUAD’DIB ARRESTED AND HELD FOR DEPORTATION
Guest blog by Jim Fetzer
In a stunning development, Ireland’s highest court ruled in favor of the extradition of Muad’Dib, who produced “7/7 Ripple Effect“, to England to stand trial for attempting to corrupt the judicial system. The charge is in fact quite absurd, since Muad’Dib simply sent copies of his DVD to the court in England in an attempt to preclude the miscarriage of justice that would be involved in sentencing friends of the alleged “bombers” for their complicity in the matter, which is completely unjustified, once one becomes aware of the apparent governmental complicity in staging the 7/7 attacks.
The court addressed only three of some fifty-four points Muad’Dib had made in his own defense while ignoring the remainder. According to a friend of Muad’Dib, Rob, who was present at the hearing, they used tortured logic and distorted language to justify their otherwise grossly improper verdict. The judges did not even bother to view “7/7 Ripple Effect”, which appears on its face to be completely unreasonable, since it was alleged to be the content of that DVD that is responsible for the extradition request. For all the judges knew, the DVD could have been a Beatles’ concert or completely blank.
Rob called me from Ireland and we recorded two 25-30 minute segments about this travesty, which are linked below. A web site about the proceeding and relevant records such as Muad’Dib’s brief is archived at http://mtrial.org. In addition, I have interviewed Muad’Dib twice–once for two hours and once for another–as well as two experts on these attacks, Nicholas Kollerstrom, author of TERROR ON THE TUBE, and Rory Ridley-Duff of Sheffield University. All of these interviews are available at http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com:
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2009
7/7 Ripple Effect
Exposing the “false flag” London attack
FRIDAY, JULY 17, 2009
Muad’Dib / Declan & Lola Heavey
“7/7 Ripple Effect” / religionandmorality.net
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2009
Nicholas Kollerstrom
9/11, 7/7, and more
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 25, 2009
Rory Ridley-Duff
7/7 London Attacks: Fact or Fiction?
FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 2010
Nicholas Kollerstrom
1994 False Flag Attacks in London
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2010
Nick Kollerstrom
Formal inquiry into 7/7
What kind of justice can he expect from the government that staged the 7/7 attacks?
Greetings Kevin Barrett, I hope this finds you well, in good spirit and having a good day. Jim Fetzer has contacted me to express your possible interest in having me on your program to do a brief interview discussing what has happened this week with Muad'Dib. Muad'Dib was incarcerated Thursday, 11/11/2010 after the Irish Supreme Court ruled to extradite Him to the United Kingdom on foot of an European arrest warrant to facilitate his prosecution for an offence described in the warrant as “doing an act tending and intended to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law.” Muad'Dib will now be facing the possibility of life in prison if convicted of this completely ridiculous charge, all for sending a DVD of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the court that was trying (for the second time) the supposed "helpers" of the 4 alleged 7/7 London bombers. As you know from your interview with Muad'Dib, the judge and the QC barrister in the case had tried to mislead the jury from the onset. The judge, Justice Gross, is quoted to have said: "As you know, Mohammed Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Jermaine Lindsay and Hasib Hussain were responsible for causing a series of explosions on the London Underground and public transport system on July 7, 2005, that killed 52 people and injured hundreds of others", despite Khan, Tanweer, Lindsay and Hussain having NEVER been proven guilty of the 7/7 London bombings in any court of law, not to mention MILLIONS of people doubting the British government's "official" cover-story. This Irish Supreme Court ruling to surrender Muad'Dib to the British government should also serve as concrete proof to the Irish people that there is NO justice in Ireland, just as there is no independent republic of Ireland. They obviously still fear and answer to the British crown, or such an unreasonable ruling would not be possible. "Fear is the mind-killer" — Muad'Dib from the film "Dune" (1984). Please let me know how you would like to conduct the interview, what information you would like to share with your listeners in this update and anything else that may be required. Thank-you in advance for this and for your efforts in getting the truth out to others, not to mention your work and Jim Fetzer's work on the "9/11 Ripple Effect", which has hopefully opened the eyes of many others to the truth. Peace be upon you, Rob
We'll try to do a brief MuadDib update with Rob halfway through the first hour of today's show. That would be 5:30 p.m. US Central, which is 11:30 p.m. Dublin time.
Listen live at http://www.AmericanFreedomRadio.com
Hi Kevin,
Peter Power, who as WeAreChangeUK showed was reluctant to talk about which organisation had asked Visor Consultants to work on a crisis management plan for 7/7 when they spoke to him in April 2008, [1], subsequently left comments on the Internet, claiming Visor Consultants was working for Reed Elsevier, (a company which has links to the arms industry and the Ministry of Defence).
On the 6th of April, 2009, in response to a news item and a short blog related to the 7/7 bombings that were posted on the Uncensored.co.nz website, he stated in the comment section that in 2005 Reed Elsevier asked Visor Consultants to prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse, and he wrote that: "Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July…”.
His full statement is here, http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/04/peter-power-some-companies-used-g-20-protests-as-%E2%80%9Ctraining-for-flu-pandemic%E2%80%9D/
He provided this same statement to the j7: July 7th Truth Campaign Blog website back on the 3rd of October 2008, although it did not attract any media attention then.
The following article covers the matter:
Peter Power Reveals More Details of 7/7 Terrorist Bombing Drills
http://www.prisonplanet.com/peter-power-reveals-more-details-of-77-terrorist-bombing-drills.html
[1] WearechangeUK talks to Peter Power
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29tzNXKUL-Q
Thanks for that information, Clare!
Give us the address to the Supreme Court of Ireland. Let's all send them "Ripple Effect".
Thanks!
Michael Cook
Please see the requested address for the Irish Supreme Court below from, their website (http://www.supremecourt.ie):, The Supreme Court of Ireland, Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, IRELAND, It might also be of interest to you and your listeners to know that DVDs, of both the "7/7 Ripple Effect and the "9/11 Ripple Effect" were delivered to all 166 members of the Dail (the Irish Congress) prior to Muad'Dib's Supreme Court extradition trial.
Please see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtTQeQbCmv0
for the video evidence of the delivery of the information to the Dail.
– Rob
panic in London… rememebr we are in the middlee of the fake independant inquiry which is still not looking at MI5 role as it is evident that brertisih zionist jews inside the government have a direct involvement in the operation…
May Allah swt free Muad'dib
A question for Rob
Did Muad'dib ask the people who were on trial or their defense team for permission before he sent a copy of his DVD to the jury foreman?
Easy question. The answer: Almost certainly not. If he had asked and they'd said yes, they'd be in the dock now right along with him! (If you're going to do something possibly illegal that the authorities will certainly find out about in order to help someone, obviously you don't ask approval from the people you're helping!)
And if Muad'dib had somehow been dumb enough to ask them, and they had been insane enough to say yes, obviously neither Rob nor Muad'dib would want to confirm that.
"Anonymous," you're not a UK prosecutor by any chance?
Anon at 9:57pm — "the people who were on trial" should never have been put on trial in the first place.
But both of the fascist and totalitarian entities of US and UK have devised so-called legal systems in which the state and its gloating lawyers are free persecute, and ensure the conviction of all the hapless Muslims paraded as terrorists beforehand. It's significant that many of the hands behind the scenes of the war against Islam are jewish and zionist (operating via their influential think tanks and lobbyists). This level of brutality seems to be a natural inclination, much like with their predecessors who subjected millions of Russians to an untimely end.
Somewhere Ralph and Mya were mentioned — so what if they are marxist? Their broadcasts are a superb and detailed documentation quoting much from the NYT and Wash Post of how bad and bogus it really is. As is the work of Steve Lendman.
My prayers are with Muad'dib, to whom along with the aforementioned, Muslims owe a massive debt of gratitude, and who should be in the forefront to protest.
Sally
No Kevin, I am not a UK prosecutor or any other agent of the state
I feel like asking you the same question sometimes. This being one of them
You seem quite cavalier about the fact that Muad'dib attempted to interfere in a trial without checking to see if the people who were on trial or their defence team approved of his intervention
Forget the illegality of Muad'dib's action for moment, what about the morality of his behaviour? Imagine you were on trial and you discovered that some idiot was sending material to the judge and jury without your consent?
If you, the accused, approved of the material being sent you could include it in your own defence. There would be no need to commit an illegal act. If you didn't approve of the material the idiot sending it has absolutely no right to be sending it
Compelling evidence that the accused London bombers were innocent, and that the UK government conducted the operation and framed the patsies, needed to be presented to everyone involved with that trial, with or without the consent of the corrupt pseudo-defense or the murderous, lying "state." There is a legal tradition of people submitting friend-of-the-court briefs without approval either by defense or prosecution – especially if a terrible injustice is in the offing – and if ever there was a time for such a friend-of-the-court brief, this was it.
You know as well as I do that virtually all lawyers are too corrupt (i.e. worried about their reputations in a society based on lies) to present an honest "the government did 7/7" defense; and that if Muad'dib had asked permission from the so-called defense he would have been turned down.
All of us have been victimized to such an extent by the big lies of state-sponsored false-flag terror that we should be taking advantage of every conceivable opportunity to get the word out – including through acts that answer to a higher law than the law of the corrupt, lying government. Here, Muad'Dib clearly was not even violating the law! Yet you're condemning him because he didn't ask permission from the obviously corrupt defense team?!
• Before readers to this site spin even faster in their conspiratorial orbit as a result of what’s written so far, do bear in mind the London Underground system has been bombed by terrorists at least 22 times to date, since 1885. Very many organisations have, not surprisingly, carried out similar exercises as we did for our client in 2005. For example, Dutsche Bank also ran an exercise very similar to ours the day before. Given the location of our client and the purpose of this particular exercise inject, we only had about 9 stations to choose from for our simulated test (that involved 6 people – from our client company who employ 1000 people). Not the entire underground system.
• There has also been much blinkered interest in the UK and elsewhere about a so called documentary entitled ’7/7 Ripple Effect’ narrated by someone with a very menacing voice called Muad’Dib who seeks to ‘tell the truth’ about 7/7. However, Muad’Dib is in fact a fictional character in a science fiction novel ‘Dune’ written by Frank Herbert in 1965. The actual narrator and producer of the video is a Mr John Hill, an elderly conspiracy theorist from Sheffield UK who likes to read make believe stories and, who also believes he is the second coming of Christ.
• There have been similar claims to ‘expose the facts’ made by a previous M15 employee, David Shayler. Interestingly he competes with Mr Hill to also be the self proclaimed reincarnation of Jesus Christ, although in the case of Shayler he now dresses in women’s clothes and refers to himself as Dolores, perhaps making his claim to be the Messiah slightly more dubious?
Peter Power, have you read Nafeez Ahmed's and Nick Kollerstrom's books on 7/7 ? Have you studied the extensive history of state-sponsored false-flag terror? Do you rely on ad-hominem insults because you have no serious arguments? (To see what kind of people speak out on 9/11 and/or 7/7 see http://www.patriotsquestion911.com ). And have you calculated the odds that someone would happen to choose for your exercise the three (four?) stations where actual bombs went off? Hint: Start by calculating the odds of choosing three/four correct hits out of seven possibilities, i.e. a shell game with peas under three (or four) of the seven shells – how often will you pick only the shells with the peas? Then calculate the number of days since 1885 and divide by 22, and multiply those two fractions. Then go back and look at the interviews you did on 7/7, and tell me which one of us is crazy.
Kevin
Do you even know the outcome of the trial Muad'dib attempted to interfere with? Or the charges? Or the names of the accused?
I'll give you a clue. They were acquitted
The long-delayed inquest into the 7/7 bombings is currently taking place and independent activists have already identified numerous anomalies and flaws in the material that has been presented at the hearings. From what I have seen and heard it seems to me that you are nowhere near up to speed with 7/7 developments and, instead of making people aware of that research, you are directing them towards a sideshow, timed beautifully to coincide with the inquest
I don't think the horrific injustice being visited upon Muad'Dib is a "sideshow." But I would be happy to have a show on other recent 7/7 developments. Can you suggest a guest? I've discussed 7/7 in the past during radio interviews with Ian Henshall, Nick Kollerstrom, Annie Machon (briefly, among other topics) and of course Muad'Dib.
Who is MuadDib? Maybe his website can give you an insight…I do not trust everything he says when he uses to Qur'an to bolster his claim, then accuses the Qur'an readers that Isaac is the Blessed son. Yes, he was blessed, but not the firstborn. It is the first born who was to be sacrificed. If Ishmael was not important, why was Hajar sent back and told to submit. The very name Ishmael means according to Genesis, "GOD Hears". The prayers of Abraham, and the sufferings of a pregnant woman. That is why she is comforted. Her story is predominantly in the Torah. Not in the Glorious Qur'an. Muad'Dib should not use the Qur'an to bolster his claims. Of course, it is not the first time people acknowledge the authenticity of the Book, then throw aspersions on it. It is a Clear Book, with Clear Evidence.
And does Jesus really need a crown to complete his mission of killing the anti-Christ? He was sweating before they tried to put him to death on the cross like a criminal, and according the Hadith he will be sweating as he descends. The gentle, peaceful Prophet returns to tell people he is not, and never was even remotely, related to The All Mighty. Life on earth will be a good one, after the dajjal, but there will still be another threat called gog and magog, who only GOD, The Ever Living, All Powerful can take out. Demonstrating yet again, Jesus have no power but what God allows him to accomplish, as all of us human kind. No one can see GOD and live. His Glory would burn us up. (Not the fiery kind)
We all are just lowly human created from dust, from a despicable fluid and will return to dust, again.
The antiChrist as he rules the world from Jerusalem in deception, will be accepted by the ignorant believers, as he will claim to be a prophet, then god, himself. If anyone claims to be a prophet…get thee far away. If anyone claims to be god…run for your life…it will only be the anti_Christ, who The True Ever Living God has given the power to test and deceive those who claim to believe in THE ONE and ONLY GOD, yet hear and DISOBEY…worshipping everything but GOD and breaking His Commandments.
Wake up and save yourself and your families before true pain and grief stricken you.
If we cannot handle pain and suffering here, in a very tiny dose, how will we handle it there where there is no relief, not even for a second. And there is no death.
• Before readers to this site spin even faster in their conspiratorial orbit as a result of what’s written so far, do bear in mind the London Underground system has been bombed by terrorists at least 22 times to date, since 1885. Very many organisations have, not surprisingly, carried out similar exercises as we did for our client in 2005. For example, Dutsche Bank also ran an exercise very similar to ours the day before. Given the location of our client and the purpose of this particular exercise inject, we only had about 9 stations to choose from for our simulated test (that involved 6 people – from our client company who employ 1000 people). Not the entire underground system.
• There has also been much blinkered interest in the UK and elsewhere about a so called documentary entitled ’7/7 Ripple Effect’ narrated by someone with a very menacing voice called Muad’Dib who seeks to ‘tell the truth’ about 7/7. However, Muad’Dib is in fact a fictional character in a science fiction novel ‘Dune’ written by Frank Herbert in 1965. The actual narrator and producer of the video is a Mr John Hill, an elderly conspiracy theorist from Sheffield UK who likes to read make believe stories and, who also believes he is the second coming of Christ.
• There have been similar claims to ‘expose the facts’ made by a previous M15 employee, David Shayler. Interestingly he competes with Mr Hill to also be the self proclaimed reincarnation of Jesus Christ, although in the case of Shayler he now dresses in women’s clothes and refers to himself as Dolores, perhaps making his claim to be the Messiah slightly more dubious?